<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D700 and D60: Image Quality at ISO 1600 Compared</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quillcards.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/14/nikon-d700-and-d60-image-quality-at-iso-1600-compared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quillcards.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/14/nikon-d700-and-d60-image-quality-at-iso-1600-compared/</link>
	<description>photography, travel, literature, &#38; the environment – and the stories behind the photos that feature in our ecards &#38; prints</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bennett</title>
		<link>http://quillcards.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/14/nikon-d700-and-d60-image-quality-at-iso-1600-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quillcards.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>While you are here, take a look at the lead post &#039;Lone Tree In Winter&#039;  - hope you like it.

Best

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you are here, take a look at the lead post &#8216;Lone Tree In Winter&#8217;  &#8211; hope you like it.</p>
<p>Best</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shipra Chauhan</title>
		<link>http://quillcards.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/14/nikon-d700-and-d60-image-quality-at-iso-1600-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator>Shipra Chauhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quillcards.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-1181</guid>
		<description>Thank you- will wait for another instructive post from you.
Wish you the very best for the New Year too David!:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you- will wait for another instructive post from you.<br />
Wish you the very best for the New Year too David!:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bennett</title>
		<link>http://quillcards.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/14/nikon-d700-and-d60-image-quality-at-iso-1600-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-1179</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quillcards.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-1179</guid>
		<description>Yes, the image quality from the two lenses might not be the same. I&#039;ll post two images when this holiday rush is over.

And all the best to you for the New Year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the image quality from the two lenses might not be the same. I&#8217;ll post two images when this holiday rush is over.</p>
<p>And all the best to you for the New Year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shipra Chauhan</title>
		<link>http://quillcards.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/14/nikon-d700-and-d60-image-quality-at-iso-1600-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>Shipra Chauhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quillcards.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>Great comparison as always! I don&#039;t have a D60... how about comparing using the same lens 50mm/1.8f or the other on both the cameras? The noise would not be affected I believe, but the sharpness of the image quality might differ on two different lenses at same aperture? I am thinking of  the lens&#039;s sweet spot...which could be another comparison in itself actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comparison as always! I don&#8217;t have a D60&#8230; how about comparing using the same lens 50mm/1.8f or the other on both the cameras? The noise would not be affected I believe, but the sharpness of the image quality might differ on two different lenses at same aperture? I am thinking of  the lens&#8217;s sweet spot&#8230;which could be another comparison in itself actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bennett</title>
		<link>http://quillcards.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/14/nikon-d700-and-d60-image-quality-at-iso-1600-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-1138</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quillcards.com/blog/?p=2057#comment-1138</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the question.

General shot? That&#039;s easily fixed, I&#039;ll set up the cameras next time I am out.

Watch this space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the question.</p>
<p>General shot? That&#8217;s easily fixed, I&#8217;ll set up the cameras next time I am out.</p>
<p>Watch this space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

