<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D700 and Nikon D60: Comparing Image Quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quillcards.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/09/nikon-d700-and-nikon-d60-comparing-image-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quillcards.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/09/nikon-d700-and-nikon-d60-comparing-image-quality/</link>
	<description>photography, travel, literature, &#38; the environment – and the stories behind the photos that feature in our ecards &#38; prints</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:41:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikon D700 and D60: Image Quality at ISO 1600 Compared — Quillcards</title>
		<link>http://quillcards.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/09/nikon-d700-and-nikon-d60-comparing-image-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon D700 and D60: Image Quality at ISO 1600 Compared — Quillcards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quillcards.com/blog/?p=1809#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>[...] the field of view was similar for both photographs as noted in this earlier article here comparing image quality under controlled lighting. I shot Aperture Priority with the same settings for both [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the field of view was similar for both photographs as noted in this earlier article here comparing image quality under controlled lighting. I shot Aperture Priority with the same settings for both [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bennett</title>
		<link>http://quillcards.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/09/nikon-d700-and-nikon-d60-comparing-image-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quillcards.com/blog/?p=1809#comment-985</guid>
		<description>The bottom line for me is to know whether I should retire the D60.

I don&#039;t want to because it is very light and small, particularly when married with a good lens, which the 35mm f1.8 AF-S lens is. That makes it an excellent &lt;em&gt;carry everywhere&lt;/em&gt; camera.

I think what I showed is that provided one recognizes the dynamic range limitations of the D60 and don&#039;t use it for scenes that depend on gentle subtlety of color, then it is an excellent camera.

The D5000 is probably better - and the D90 better again. The video capability on these two cameras is enticing. 

Do you shoot video on your D90?

I chose the white background because it is unforgiving, and shows any shadows most harshly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bottom line for me is to know whether I should retire the D60.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to because it is very light and small, particularly when married with a good lens, which the 35mm f1.8 AF-S lens is. That makes it an excellent <em>carry everywhere</em> camera.</p>
<p>I think what I showed is that provided one recognizes the dynamic range limitations of the D60 and don&#8217;t use it for scenes that depend on gentle subtlety of color, then it is an excellent camera.</p>
<p>The D5000 is probably better &#8211; and the D90 better again. The video capability on these two cameras is enticing. </p>
<p>Do you shoot video on your D90?</p>
<p>I chose the white background because it is unforgiving, and shows any shadows most harshly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shipra Chauhan</title>
		<link>http://quillcards.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/09/nikon-d700-and-nikon-d60-comparing-image-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>Shipra Chauhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quillcards.com/blog/?p=1809#comment-984</guid>
		<description>Hmm..I see it...more contrast or abruptness as you put it, in the D60 shot. But ever so slight. The fact that the two crops themselves are different is probably distracting me a bit.
Did you choose the white backdrop for a reason?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm..I see it&#8230;more contrast or abruptness as you put it, in the D60 shot. But ever so slight. The fact that the two crops themselves are different is probably distracting me a bit.<br />
Did you choose the white backdrop for a reason?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bennett</title>
		<link>http://quillcards.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/09/nikon-d700-and-nikon-d60-comparing-image-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-946</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quillcards.com/blog/?p=1809#comment-946</guid>
		<description>I think it can be seen in these shots. Dynamic range is like bookends squeezing an image from the shadows and the highlights.

I think the D60 image looks more squeezed - the transition from dark to light is more abrupt.  The range from dark to light in the shot from the D700 looks more open. That&#039;s how I see it.

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it can be seen in these shots. Dynamic range is like bookends squeezing an image from the shadows and the highlights.</p>
<p>I think the D60 image looks more squeezed &#8211; the transition from dark to light is more abrupt.  The range from dark to light in the shot from the D700 looks more open. That&#8217;s how I see it.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bennett</title>
		<link>http://quillcards.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/09/nikon-d700-and-nikon-d60-comparing-image-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quillcards.com/blog/?p=1809#comment-945</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s next on the list of things to do - look out for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s next on the list of things to do &#8211; look out for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

